<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorcery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thestever.net/2009/09/08/sorcery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thestever.net/2009/09/08/sorcery/</link>
	<description>Steve Quezadas blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 07:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stever Robbins</title>
		<link>http://blog.thestever.net/2009/09/08/sorcery/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stever Robbins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thestever.net/?p=342#comment-63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hail, fellow Stever!

SICP is one of the most awesome books &lt;i&gt;ever&lt;/i&gt;. I took &lt;i&gt;Structure and Interpretation&lt;/i&gt; from Sussman and Abelson my freshman year at MIT. It was the most influential, mind-blowing class for me that I&#039;ve ever taken.

Interestingly, I&#039;ve heard that Sussman has changed his attitude about what should actually be taught in college. While he theoretically still supports abstraction, modularity, and all that good stuff, I&#039;ve heard that he doesn&#039;t believe the industry has developed in a direction that makes those valuable, marketable skills. So now he&#039;s in favor of more practical, albeit less theoretically pure instruction in programming.

Personally, I always considered programming half wizardry, half art. SICP does the best job of any text I know at capturing both of those. I&#039;ve written large software systems (compilers and window systems) using the SICP principles and found them powerful, elegant, and engaging.

Enjoy the journey!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hail, fellow Stever!</p>
<p>SICP is one of the most awesome books <i>ever</i>. I took <i>Structure and Interpretation</i> from Sussman and Abelson my freshman year at MIT. It was the most influential, mind-blowing class for me that I&#8217;ve ever taken.</p>
<p>Interestingly, I&#8217;ve heard that Sussman has changed his attitude about what should actually be taught in college. While he theoretically still supports abstraction, modularity, and all that good stuff, I&#8217;ve heard that he doesn&#8217;t believe the industry has developed in a direction that makes those valuable, marketable skills. So now he&#8217;s in favor of more practical, albeit less theoretically pure instruction in programming.</p>
<p>Personally, I always considered programming half wizardry, half art. SICP does the best job of any text I know at capturing both of those. I&#8217;ve written large software systems (compilers and window systems) using the SICP principles and found them powerful, elegant, and engaging.</p>
<p>Enjoy the journey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

